linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] mm: Move common segments checks to separate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b040c32a0701250116l250338b6r37dc11df10b9d27b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:16:00 -0800
From:	"Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>
To:	"Dmitriy Monakhov" <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, akpm@...l.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: Move common segments checks to separate function

Dmitriy Monakhov wrote on Jan 24, 11:00 pm
> > Move common segments checks from  __generic_file_aio_{read,write}_nolock()
> > to separate helper function generic_segment_checks().WOW my eyes ....
> I'm realy sorry but this patch is litle bit broken. :(
> I've forgot to check generic_segment_checks() return value.

why not remove the for loop all together?  like this:

http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_frm/thread/97550ddba48c8c8b/623ddad30b547702?lnk=st&q=&rnum=9#623ddad30b547702
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/