linux-kernel - Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45B89C99.2060500@free.fr>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:03:37 +0100
From:	John <shill@...e.fr>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	tglx@...esys.com, mingo@...e.hu, johnstul@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...l.org, shill@...e.fr
Subject: Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late

[ Re-sending in the hope that it will be archived ]

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> John Stultz wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 10:41 +0100, John wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm using the POSIX timers API. My platform is x86 running Linux
>>> 2.6.18.6 patched with the high-resolution timer subsystem.
>>> 
>>> http://www.tglx.de/hrtimers.html
>>> 
>>> My process is the only SCHED_FIFO process on the system. There are 
>>> no user-space processes with a higher priority. AFAICT, only a 
>>> kernel thread could keep the CPU away from my app.
>>> 
>>> Is there a periodic kernel thread that runs every 2 seconds, cannot 
>>> be preempted, and runs for over 50 µs??
>> 
>> This sounds like a BIOS SMI issue. Can you reproduce this behavior on 
>> different hardware?
> 
> note that only the -hrt patchset is used - not the full -rt patchset
> - so 50 usecs delays (and more) are quite possible and common.

Ingo,

You are correct, I only used -hrt.
I will _definitely_ give -rt a try.

I am fully aware that an occasional 100 µs delay is possible, given a
soft real-time operating system. However, what I cannot explain is:

Why do these /occasional/ delays always happen a multiple of 2 seconds
apart? Can you explain this odd behavior?

> My question would be: does the same problem occur with the full -rt
> patchset and PREEMPT_RT? (see http://rt.wiki.kernel.org for details)

I will test on a different PC, as John suggested.
I will try the full -rt patchset in a few days.

+++++

On a related note, there is no -hrt patch for 2.6.19:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/
Is it because the patch for 2.6.19-rc4-mm1 applies cleanly to 2.6.19?

There is no -hrt patch for 2.6.20.
Has it been completely merged?

Regards.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/