linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1HA3iW-0000kF-VU@be1.lrz>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:28:36 +0100
From:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To:	Scott Preece <sepreece@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Alessandro Di Marco <dmr@....it>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vojtech@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0

Scott Preece <sepreece@...il.com> wrote:

> My own hot button is making sure that the definition of what
> constitutes user activity is managed in exactly one place, whether in
> the kernel or not. My naive model would be to put the response at user
> level, but to provide a single point of definition in the kernel (say,
> /dev/useractivity or the equivalent) that the user-level daemon could
> listen to.

Imagine one computer serving two users. Two monitors, two keyboards ...
-- 
Funny quotes:
38. Last night I played a blank tape at full blast. The mime next door went
    nuts.
Friß, Spammer: hEOzVVU@....7eggert.dyndns.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/