[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878xfrglip.fsf@gmx.it>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:43:10 +0100
From: Alessandro Di Marco <dmr@....it>
To: "Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com>
Cc: 7eggert@....de, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vojtech@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0
"Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com> writes:
On 1/25/07, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de> wrote:
> Imagine one computer serving two users. Two monitors, two keyboards ...
---
Good point! Of late I've been working on single-user systems, so it
was not at the front of my brain, despite years of building and using
multi-user systems.
It's a point that multi-user systems have struggled with forever (when
somebody inserts a CR in the drive mounted in the system box, which user do
you pop up a media player for?).
sed s/user X's screensaver/suspend to disk/g <<EOF
I tend to think it's not a kernel-vs-user-space issue, though. To
solve it you need, somewhere, a notion of a "user session" and you
need some way to separate system-level issues (like low-battery) from
user-level issues (like activiating user X's screensaver).
EOF
Are you sure?
best,
--
Experience teaches slowly and at the cost of mistakes. - James A. Froude
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists