[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1169742375.3593.110.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:26:15 +0800
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: Don't call bmdma_stop on non DMA capable
controllers
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 16:22 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> The zero DMA address is absolutely and totally valid. It might not
> correspond with physical address zero on platforms.
>
> Also, DMA address zero is not the same as NULL.
This isn't actually "DMA address" in that context -- it's the I/O port
number at which the controller's BM-DMA control registers reside. But
still it can be zero.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists