linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1169743090.3073.71.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:38:10 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 07:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Although, to be fair, I do know that Daniel has future sched_clock 
> > related patches that need his cleanups [...]
> 
> btw., i dont find those sched_clock() changes really acceptable in their 
> present form, and i've pointed out my reasons for that in the past, ~2 
> months ago when Daniel last sent his cleanup queue.

I address your complaints .. You said you didn't want sched_clock to
have the underlying clock selectable, and it's not any longer .. You
also said I was adding cycles to the scheduling hot patch which I
addressed , but it's not clear if really needed.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/