lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:34:19 -0500
From:	xiphmont@...h.org
To:	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@...eus.cx>, fedora-desktop-list@...hat.com,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, jrb@...hat.com,
	"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mclasen@...hat.com, "Lennart Poettering" <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	perex@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] alsa: correct nonsensical sysfs device symlinks

On 1/25/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:

> The problem with your patch is that it breaks the structure newly
> introduced.  In the new tree, card* contains the whole belonging
> devices, and each device points to the one in the card object.
> Passing dev->parent there cuts the relation between the card object
> and each device.
>
> That's why my patch rules out setting card->dev with ifdef
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED.  As fallback, it takes the parent device to
> build the old style tree.
>
> > Having just checked a 2.6.18 machine, none of the device symlinks
> > point to card* objects; thay all point to /sys/devices/....
>
> Yes, it's a new stuff.

[This does beg the question: Does the benefit of this complete
restructuring in a subminor release of an allegedly stable kernel
outweigh the fact that it breaks all audio for any user running a
gnome desktop?]

OK, so my patch should be passing card->parent or dev->parent only in
the case that CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is set, and leaving the call the
way it was previously in the case CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set.
Essentially, ifdef/else both cases?

Is this also going to have to be the case for every other class type
that converts from class_device_create to device_create?

Monty




>
>
> Takashi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ