| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@...k.net> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote: > On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: > > > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot: > > > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg > > > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps. > > > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like > > > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need. > > > > thanks for your report. > > > > Can you narrow down a bit when it started? > > Is 2.6.19 OK? > > Is 2.6.18 OK? > > Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me. with debug options enabled oops looks better: http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-oops-01.jpg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists