linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ).

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:50:45 -0500
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Paweł Sikora <pluto@...k.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ).

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:

> > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot:
> > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg
> > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps.
> > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like
> > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need.
> 
> thanks for your report.
> 
> Can you narrow down a bit when it started?
> Is 2.6.19 OK?
> Is 2.6.18 OK?

Is the stack trace always the same?  It doesn't make much sense to me.

if AMD cool & quiet is enabled in the BIOS, but CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n
in the kernel, do you see the same problem?

thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/