[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070125054242.GA8799@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:42:42 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: S?bastien Dugu? <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Jean Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 4/5][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:11:30PM +0100, S?bastien Dugu? wrote:
> > > + if (unlikely(!notify->sigq))
> > > + return -EAGAIN;
> >
> > Did this just leak a ref on the task_struct?
> >
>
> No, the ref is released in really_put_req() when we dispose of
> the iocb.
And the code really needs a comment explaining this. I tripped over
this before, and I think it's even already the second time Andrew
stumbled over it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists