lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:08:19 +0000 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@...lingofgreen.ru> Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>, Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define the EF_AS_NO_RANDOM e_flag bit Hi! > > > Should we introduce per-arch asm/elf.h files to hold the relevant flag definitions then? > > > > On some architectures there are no bits left. On others you'd need to go > > through whomever maintains the relevant psABI to get a bit officially > > allocated. Really, it is very bad idea to use e_flags for this. > > How does one find the relevant maintainers? Andi Kleen maintains both i386 and x86-64, so it should be easy. (Ouch and make it one patch, it is too short to split...) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists