[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070126102315.GA110@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:23:15 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@...ac.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>, herbert@...hfloor.at,
akpm@...l.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] namespaces: fix exit race by splitting exit
On 01/26, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Ok, could you verify that the following patch at least solves
> > the oopsing?
> >
> > (I can't reproduce the oops with Daniel's test prog)
> >
> > thanks,
> > -serge
>
> Indeed, this patch solves the oopsing, but so did the last one. I think I
> finally managed to figure out why too, as release_task would be called
> with current referring to the parent process, or whoever is reaping the
> process with the last reference to the namespace. Right?
Not always. The task can do release_task() on itself if it is sub-thread,
or its parent ignores SIGCHLD.
Anyway I think your explanation is correct for this particular test-case.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists