[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070126031300.59f75b06.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:13:00 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Track mlock()ed pages
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Add NR_MLOCK
> > >
> > > Track mlocked pages via a ZVC
Why?
> > I think it is not quite right. You are tracking the number of ptes
> > that point to mlocked pages, which can be >= the actual number of pages.
>
> Mlocked pages are not inherited. I would expect sharing to be very rare.
>
> > Also, page_add_anon_rmap still needs to be balanced with page_remove_rmap.
>
> Hmmm....
>
> > I can't think of an easy way to do this without per-page state. ie.
> > another page flag.
>
> Thats what I am trying to avoid.
You could perhaps go for a walk across all the other vmas which presently
map this page. If any of them have VM_LOCKED, don't increment the counter.
Similar on removal: only decrement the counter when the final mlocked VMA
is dropping the pte.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists