[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45BA31B3.2020203@inbox.ru>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:52:03 +0300
From: Viktor <vvp01@...ox.ru>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
CC: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Aubrey <aubreylee@...il.com>, Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT question
Mark Lord wrote:
> You guys need to backup in this thread.
>
> Every example of O_DIRECT here could be replaced with
> calls to mmap(), msync(), and madvise() (or posix_fadvise).
No. How about handling IO errors? There is no practical way for it with
mmap().
> In addition to being at least as fast as O_DIRECT,
> these have the added benefit of using the page cache
> (avoiding reads for data already present, handling multiple
> users of the same data, etc..).
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists