linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19.2, cp 18gb_file 18gb_file.2 = OOM killer, 100% reproducible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:49:28 +0100
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	thunder7@...all.nl, Avuton Olrich <avuton@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19.2, cp 18gb_file 18gb_file.2 = OOM killer, 100% reproducible

On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, thunder7@...all.nl wrote:
> 
> > From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
> > Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> > > 
> > > 
> > > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine.  I can't go back 
> > > to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly and 
> > > the Alsa Intel HD Audio driver has bugs etc, I guess I am stuck with 
> > > 2.6.19.2 :(
> > > 
> > Well, if you can't go back, you could always test 2.6.20-rc5. That's why
> > it's out there :-) It can't be any worse!
> > 
> > Good luck,
> > Jurriaan
> > -- 
> > It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm really
> > quite busy.
> > 	Hans Haas
> > Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.20-rc5 2x2011 bogomips load 1.97
> > the Jack Vance Integral Edition: http://www.integralarchive.org
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> 
> It is worse-- NAT doesn't work and HDDTEMP doesn't work anymore either.


Do I understand it correctly from the further emails in this thread that 
the NAT problem was the known netfilter options mess when upgrading from 
2.6.19 to 2.6.20, and enabling some more netfilter options fixed it?


hddtemp has a known bug:

Subject    : `hddtemp' no longer works
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/272
             http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7581
Submitter  : Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>
             Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@...oste.net>
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Status     : bug in hddtemp: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7581


> Justin.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/