[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B95D3A.10108@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:45:30 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: Don't call bmdma_stop on non DMA capable
controllers
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> You're thinking of MMIO, while the case we were discussing was PIO. My
>> laptop is perfectly happy to assign PIO resources from zero.
>
> I was indeed thinking MMIO, but I really think it should extend to PIO
> also. It certainly is (again) true on PC's, where the low IO space is
> special and reserved for motherboard/system devices.
Via the even-less-of-an-excuse-than-you-thought department:
Many (most?) non-x86 handle PIO via special mappings and additional
serialization instructions, but otherwise treat PIO register space in a
very similar manner to MMIO.
Thus, it's /easier/ on non-x86 to ensure that PIO addresses never land
at zero, because you must remap /anyway/. It's only on x86 that PIO
register spaces are accessed by vastly different CPU instructions. Most
other arches convert PIO accesses into massage+mmio R/W+massage.
On sparc64, for example, after I pointed this out to DaveM, he was able
to implement the new iomap interface without the 'if (pio-mem-area)'
branch present on x86.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists