[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070126184942.GP17836@stusta.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:49:42 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@...l.emu.id.au>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kurt.hackel@...cle.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: [2.6 patch] fix OCFS2 compile error
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:22:34PM +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I should have added that this is on Debian stable:
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
>
> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> > i386
> > Practically all modules selected.
> >
> > Building modules, stage 2.
> > MODPOST 1931 modules
>...
> > WARNING: "__udivdi3" [fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.ko] undefined!
> > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
Thanks for your report.
I don't know why gcc 3.3 generates this now since ocfs2_backup_super_blkno()
seems to be unused, but there is a bug for 32 bit systems that should be
fixed:
Commit 50af94b14c98f5769860a282a397c6f3b135c8a8 adds:
offset /= sb->s_blocksize;
That is:
u64 = u64 / long
Not a problem on 64bit architectures, but obviously a problem on 32 bit
architectures.
This patch fixes it by using sb->s_blocksize_bits instead of sb->s_blocksize.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
--- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static inline u64 ocfs2_backup_super_blkno(struct super_block *sb, int index)
if (index >= 0 && index < OCFS2_MAX_BACKUP_SUPERBLOCKS) {
offset <<= (2 * index);
- offset /= sb->s_blocksize;
+ offset >>= sb->s_blocksize_bits;
return offset;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists