[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070126121739.be3e072a.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:17:39 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [mm PATCH 4/6] RCU: (now) CPU hotplug
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:16:22 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > The plan is, I hope, to rip it all out and do freeze_processes() on the
> > hotplug side, so nobody else needs to worry about cpu hotplug any more.
> > But at present everyone seems to be in hiding.
>
> This would be ideal. However, we don't seem to have any momentum
> on this.
There's no point in expending effort on a fancy new lock until this option
has been eliminated, so yeah, things are stuck.
> The other thing we would need to do in this case is to
> check if all the users of cpu hotplug can tolerate a very slow
> hotplug step if there are 10s of thousands of processes and threads.
Yes, that needs evaluation. If it's a problem then we might need to
introduce a more sophisticated user interface which enables userspace to
take multiple CPUs online and offline in a single step, rather than
one-at-a-time. I expect that'd be fairly straightforward.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists