lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45BA6D8E.1040705@tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:07:26 +0300
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Can a kobject have both bus- and class-specific uevent handlers?

Looking at drivers/base/core.c:dev_uevent() I wonder whenever
a device can have both bus-specific uevent function AND
class-specific one.  If yes, the code in that routine is umm..
wrong.  Because in this case, bus-specific attributes will
be owerwritten by class-specific ones.

I mean this code (debugging omitted for simplicity):

    if (dev->bus && dev->bus->uevent) {
            /* have the bus specific function add its stuff */
            retval = dev->bus->uevent(dev, envp, num_envp, buffer, buffer_size);
    }

    if (dev->class && dev->class->dev_uevent) {
            /* have the class specific function add its stuff */
            retval = dev->class->dev_uevent(dev, envp, num_envp, buffer, buffer_size);
    }

    return retval;

Thanks.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ