[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070126064701.GA21892@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:47:01 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc: Kristian H??gsberg <krh@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Juju
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:38:24PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:18:35 -0500, Kristian H??gsberg <krh@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > I see that ORBs are always allocated with a call (like SKB) and not
> > > embedded into drivers (like URBs). It's great, keep it up. Also,
> > > never allow drivers to pass DMA-mapped buffers into fw_send_request
> > > and friends. We made both of these mistakes in USB, and it hurts.
> >
> > Oh, the ORBs are SBP-2 specific data structures, struct fw_transaction is
> > probably what corresponds to USB URBs. This struct is defined in
> > fw-transaction.h and is available for embedding into other structs, such as
> > struct sbp2_orb in fw-sbp2. Is that what you're suggesting against, and what
> > are the problems with this approach?
>
> Fortunately we do not care about out-of-tree drivers, which are most
> affected, you may even call it a feature ^_^. My main problem is,
> we can't refcount URBs, so usbmon can't tap them and must copy.
urbs are reference counted, it's just that not all drivers who create
them use them that way :(
Perhaps you can inforce this in the new codebase...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists