linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add a rounddown_pow_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701260219040.17773@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:24:35 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a rounddown_pow_of_two() macro to log2.h.

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:32:12 -0500 (EST)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:

> > +/*
> > + * round down to nearest power of two
> > + */
> > +static inline __attribute__((const))
> > +unsigned long __rounddown_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
> > +{
> > +	return 1UL << (fls_long(n) - 1);
> > +}
>
> So __rounddown_pow_of_two(16) returns 8?

it does?  but if that was true, so would 17, and 18, and 19 ...  i
didn't actually test this since it seemed so straightforward.
doesn't fls_long() return the most significant bit?  oh, wait ...
reading further ...
 >
> >  /**
> >   * ilog2 - log of base 2 of 32-bit or a 64-bit unsigned value
> >   * @n - parameter
> > @@ -154,4 +174,20 @@ unsigned long __roundup_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
> >  	__roundup_pow_of_two(n)			\
> >   )
> >
> > +/**
> > + * rounddown_pow_of_two - round the given value down to nearest power of two
> > + * @n - parameter
> > + *
> > + * round the given value down to the nearest power of two
> > + * - the result is undefined when n == 0
> > + * - this can be used to initialise global variables from constant data
> > + */
> > +#define rounddown_pow_of_two(n)			\
> > +(						\
> > +	__builtin_constant_p(n) ? (		\
> > +		(n == 1) ? 0 :			\
> > +		(1UL << ilog2(n)) :		\
> > +	__rounddown_pow_of_two(n)		\
> > + )
>
> But (1UL << ilog2(16)) returns 16?
>
>
> And, afiact, your __rounddown_pow_of_two() is basically equivalent to (1UL
> << ilog2(n)) anyway.  So a suitable (and less buggy) implementation might be
>
> static inline unsigned long rounddown_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
> {
> 	return (n == 1) ? 0 : (1UL << ilog2(n));
> }

i think you're right.  it's been a long day so give me a few minutes
to convince myself.

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://www.fsdev.dreamhosters.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/