linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control -v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1169798617.6189.83.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:37 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pj@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control -v4

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 22:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:31:43 -0800 (PST)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > atomic_t is 32-bit.  Put 16TB of memory under writeback and blam.
> > 
> > We have systems with 8TB main memory and are able to get to 16TB.
> 
> But I bet you don't use 4k pages on 'em ;)
> 
> > Better change it now.
> 
> yup.

I can change to atomic_long_t but that would make this patch depend on
Mathieu Desnoyers' atomic.h patch series.

Do I send out a -v5 with this, or should I send an incremental patch
once that hits your tree?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/