[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070127173124.GA25282@Krystal>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:31:24 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
* Andrew Morton (akpm@...l.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:15:45 -0500
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
>
> > It mainly adds support for missing 64 bits cmpxchg and 64 bits atomic add
> > unless. Therefore, principally 64 bits architectures are targeted by these
> > patches. It also adds the complete list of atomic operations on the atomic_long
> > type.
>
> OK, I fixed eight separate compile errors in this patch series and
> now powerpc is being very ugly with a twisty maze of include dependencies.
>
> I'm giving up. Someone should publish a suite of cross-compilers for us
> so stuff like this doesn't need to happen.
Hi Andrew,
This seems to be caused by the fact that I use inline functions for
atomic_long_cmpxchg and atomic_long_xchg. I could simply use macros and
this problem would fade away.
I agree about the cross-compiler suite, it would be very useful here.
Mathieu
--
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists