[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f3aa8d60701271233o62c2c5d1w7511ce26d944d93c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:33:54 -0800
From: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>, "Jan Dittmer" <jdittmer@...0.net>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
Ingo@...cavity.nachtwache.org, Christoph@...cavity.nachtwache.org,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>, Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
ltt-dev@...fik.org, systemtap@...rces.redhat.com,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Douglas Niehaus" <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
> > Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ?
> >
> > http://buildroot.uclibc.org/
> >
>
> No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with
> scary-looking results.
>
> Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of
> cross-compiler binaries?
That's going to be tricky, even if they're statically linked, what architecture
do you want them for, etc? Plus some things seem to just refuse to statically
link now (anything with resolver code, though maybe gcc doesn't care).
If we can get the crosstool configs to build all that stuff ourselves,
for any platform, would be more flexible, IMHO.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists