[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070128162543.GA718@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:25:43 -0800
From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] fs: break the file_list_lock for sb->s_files
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:30:06PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:21:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > sb->s_files is converted to a lock_list. furthermore to prevent the
> > > > lock_list_head of getting too contended with concurrent add
> > > > operations the add is buffered in per cpu filevecs.
> > >
> > > NACK. Please don't start using lockdep internals in core code.
> >
> > what do you mean by that?
>
> struct lock_list is an lockdep implementation detail and should not
> leak out and be used anywhere else. If we want something similar it
> should be given a proper name and a header of it's own, but I don't
> think it's a valueable abstraction for the core kernel.
Christoph,
"lock list" has nothing to do with lockdep. It's a relatively new
data type used to construct concurrent linked lists using a spinlock
per entry.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists