| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45BCFE33.3000600@tls.msk.ru> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:49:07 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> CC: Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot] Bill Davidsen wrote: [] > RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1. It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically - does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for optimisations), easy to use (you'll have single array instead of at least 3), and a bit more flexible; at the same way it's less widely tested... But the end result is basically the same for both ways. /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists