[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45BD0BDC.40205@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:47:24 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...isc-linux.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>, shaohua.li@...el.com,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MSI portability cleanups
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> The only architecture problem that isn't solvable in this context is
>> the problem of supporting the crazy hypervisor on the ppc RTAS, which
>> asks us to drive the hardware but does not give us access to the
>> hardware registers.
>
> So you are saying that we should use your model while admitting that it
> can't solve our problems...
>
> I really don't understand why you seem so totally opposed to Michael's
> approach which definitely looks to me like the sane thing to do. Note
> that in the end, Michael's approach isn't -that- different from yours,
> just a bit more abstracted.
I think the high-level ops approach makes more sense. It's more future
proof, in addition to covering all existing implementations.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists