linux-kernel - [Q] Prefered suspend to ram or disk method ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23972.1169975356@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:09:16 +0100
From:	Xavier Maillard <zedek@....org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Q] Prefered suspend to ram or disk method ?

Hi there,

Just a quick and easy question for you.

I am aware of three ways to make my laptop suspend/hibernate:

1. suspend
2. ususpend
3. suspend2

The first two are directly part of the official linux
distribution and the third one is easy to install into it.

Here is my question: what is the recommended method ? How does
suspend compare to ususpend/suspend2 ? Is there any chance to see
suspend2 be part of the official linux distribution in a near
future or not ?

Regards,

Xavier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/