[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070129113328.GA9941@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:33:28 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dmonakhov@...nvz.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: + mm-search_binary_handler-mem-limit-fix.patch added to -mm tree
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:09:18AM -0800, akpm@...l.org wrote:
>
> The patch titled
> mm: search_binary_handler() mem limit fix
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> mm-search_binary_handler-mem-limit-fix.patch
>
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>
> See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: mm: search_binary_handler() mem limit fix
> From: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
>
> The function changes mem limit to USER_DS before possible modprobe, but
> never restored it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
This patch breaks s390. I haven't yet tried to figure out why, but does this
patch actually fix a real bug?
What happens is that the init process gets killed -> panic.
> fs/exec.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN fs/exec.c~mm-search_binary_handler-mem-limit-fix fs/exec.c
> --- a/fs/exec.c~mm-search_binary_handler-mem-limit-fix
> +++ a/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
> {
> int try,retval;
> struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
> + mm_segment_t oldfs;
> #ifdef __alpha__
> /* handle /sbin/loader.. */
> {
> @@ -1059,11 +1060,12 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
>
> /* kernel module loader fixup */
> /* so we don't try to load run modprobe in kernel space. */
> + oldfs = get_fs();
> set_fs(USER_DS);
>
> retval = audit_bprm(bprm);
> if (retval)
> - return retval;
> + goto out;
>
> retval = -ENOENT;
> for (try=0; try<2; try++) {
> @@ -1084,7 +1086,7 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
> bprm->file = NULL;
> current->did_exec = 1;
> proc_exec_connector(current);
> - return retval;
> + goto out;
> }
> read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
> put_binfmt(fmt);
> @@ -1092,7 +1094,7 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
> break;
> if (!bprm->file) {
> read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
> - return retval;
> + goto out;
> }
> }
> read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
> @@ -1110,6 +1112,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
> #endif
> }
> }
> +out:
> + set_fs(oldfs);
> return retval;
> }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists