| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1170032936.3054.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:08:56 +0800 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: lockmeter On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:04 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter > > stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may > > still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out > > of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream). > > We definitly should get lockmeter in. Does anyone volunteer for doing > the cleanup and merged? specifically; implementing it on top of lockdep should be very lean and simple... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists