[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701290910060.28330@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:11:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> provide an unsigned long atomic type.
Is this really necessary? We have no atomic_uint_t type either.
Could you use atomic_long_t instead?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists