linux-kernel - Re: [-mm patch] BUG at net/sunrpc/svc.c:128 (was Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:49:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] BUG at net/sunrpc/svc.c:128 (was Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm2)

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> >  static int
> >  svc_pool_map_init_percpu(struct svc_pool_map *m)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int maxpools = nr_node_ids;
> > +	unsigned int maxpools = num_online_cpus();
> >  	unsigned int pidx = 0;
> >  	unsigned int cpu;
> >  	int err;
> 
> Thanks.

Patch has the wrong solution as detailed in another message.

The line should be reverted to what it was before:

  unsigned int maxpools = highest_possible_processor_id()+1;

> Christoph, can you pleeeeeze be more careful?  A few seconds inattention
> and a dopey copy-n-paste bug leads to large amounts of wasted time for
> other people.

Looks like I need to add another nr_cpu_ids? I did not realize that the 
same weird thing was done for cpus, sigh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/