linux-kernel - Re: How many people are using 2.6.16?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:13:00 +1100
From:	Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>
To:	Mike Houston <mikeserv@...s.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: How many people are using 2.6.16?

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
> > 
> > e.g. how many downloads does it get?
> 
> I've often wondered that myself, as I'm concerned for it to continue
> to be maintained. I'm very appreciative of what Adrian is doing with
> it. (Thanks!)

We're still running 2.6.16 kernels on a bunch of machines, though 2.6.19
has been looking pretty nice on the couple of machines that are testing
it.  2.6.17 and 2.6.18 felt less stable.

We do a lot of Cyrus which does a lot of MMAP - and we also use the 
Areca driver - which are both strong reasons to move to 2.6.19.2, but
if the MMAP fix was ported back to 2.6.16 we might consider staying
there instead.

Bron.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/