linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070130081302.GA5671@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:13:02 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc6 - sky2 resume breakage


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> I /think/ my two patches should automatically avoid the 'cap themselves' 
                                                            ^--crap
> effect you outlined: the absolutely worst case should be that we'll 
> have twice the IRQ rate of the optimal one - but no irq storm nor lost 
> interrupts should happen due to irq trigger type mismatches, ever - as 
> long as the basic mapping of device to IRQ is correct. [ I tried to 
> push to include this in v2.6.20 but i lost that argument ;-) ]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/