linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cdev.h needs struct inode; add forward declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701301148130.23321@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:48:38 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...nel.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdev.h needs struct inode; add forward declaration


>include/linux/cdev.h defines cd_forget to take a struct inode *, but does not
>pull in any definition or declaration for struct inode.  This generates a
>compiler warning if a source file pulls in cdev.h without first pulling in
>fs.h.  Add a forward declaration of struct inode to cdev.h, to eliminate the
>compiler warning and preserve the ability to include headers in any arbitrary
>order.

We've been over this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/19/119
The patch went in into -mm and out again (why? - no reason was 
attached, Andrew.)


Jan
-- 
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/