| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1170177171.3420.36.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:12:51 -0600 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 08:53 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > As usual, "it depends" on the content. Can we provide them with > sufficient instructions/guidance so that the listeners get the content > that is desired instead of just some pseudo-marketing or requirements > list? Any of those panels (Customer or CPU) could have been good or > bad. This is a really nasty problem. By and large, only organisations who are active participants in the Linux community are happy sending their technical architects ungaurded to a developer summit (like we get for the CPU panel). The objective is always to get technical (not marketing) people who haven't been frightened into silence by their legal department and, if people want chipsets, that's what we'll try to do ... it just takes a lot of persuasion, so the earlier we start ... James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists