linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Host suspend/resume support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200701302319.10369.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:19:07 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	nigel@...el.suspend2.net
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Host suspend/resume support

On Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:20, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:57 +0000, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Add the necessary callbacks to suspend and resume a host running kvm.  This
> > is just a repeat of the cpu hotplug/unplug work.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
> 
> Maybe it's just a lack of understanding, but I'm wondering if this patch
> is necessary - we already hot-unplug secondary cpus prior to suspending
> devices.

Not with the reoredering patches that are in -mm, though.  With these patches,
the nonboot CPUs are disabled after "regular" devices.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
If you don't have the time to read,
you don't have the time or the tools to write.
		- Stephen King
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/