linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <00CAB6CF-640D-4449-9CBA-7E52FE9BEC37@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:45:45 -0800
From:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-aio@...ck.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks

> Btw, I noticed that you didn't Cc Ingo. Definitely worth doing. Not  
> just
> because he's basically the normal scheduler maintainer, but also  
> because
> he's historically been involved in things like the async filename  
> lookup
> that the in-kernel web server thing used.

Yeah, that was dumb.  I had him in the cc: initially, then thought it  
was too large and lobbed a bunch off.  My mistake.

Ingo, I'm interested in your reaction to the i386-specific mechanics  
here (the thread_info copies terrify me) and the general notion of  
how to tie this cleanly into the scheduler.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/