lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170116201.3378.29.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:16:40 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sd: spin down disks on removal or power-down

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> What we don't want to happen is for those disks to spin down during a
> reboot.
> It seems that this is OK with this patch.
> 
> Also, we probably don't want them to be spun down during a kexec_load,
> but
> I expect that's OK too.

Actually, there's another case where we don't want to do spin down, and
that's when we don't own the disc (think external array on a SAN).
Telling this has always been the biggest stumbling block to spin down of
SCSI devices.

There's a patch similar to yours which takes this into account, which is
currently under discussion:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=116922621200002

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ