[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45BED029.8080100@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:57:13 +0100
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Sunil Naidu <akula2.shark@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@...el.com,
alan@...hat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux
Kernel Summit
Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>> Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
>> sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
>
> Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
> for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
> contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.
Which is good, provided that non-mmu work is actively driving some of
the decisions in mainline. Given that I don't follow the non-mmu work
at all, I don't have a feel for whether that is the case, but I could
imagine that it would have some impact that needs to be taken into
account at times. My worry is for spending time and slots on things /
people dealing with classic architectures which are no longer being
manufactured and are only being maintained in catch-up mode.
Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists