linux-kernel - Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 3/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200701310135.43383.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:35:42 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	maynardj@...ibm.com
Cc:	cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 3/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:31, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> 
> > On solution would be to move the notify_active flag from ctx->spu
> > into ctx itself, but maybe there are other ways to solve this.
> In an earlier review of this patch, Christopher Hellwig suggested I move 
> the notify_active flag to be a bit in the sched_flags field that's added 
> in his scheduler patch series.  If this patch series will be a available 
> in an "Arnd" tree that we'll be using for our current OProfile 
> development, perhaps I should wait until that time to change this, since 
> the window of vulnerability is quite small.  What do you think?

Sounds good to me.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/