[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070131081831.GB25032@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:18:31 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Greg Ungerer <greg_ungerer@...urecomputing.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:48:45AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, OK, but the next question is that is some form of panel of
> outsiders still a useful feature?
>
> Previous panels we've done have been:
>
> * Device Drivers - Inputs from vendors trying to get code into the
> kernel. I had feedback that this was reasonably useful; the
> problem is that it tends to be composed of vendors already
> making a big effort on the open source process and not the ones
> (like graphics) who aren't.
> * Customer Panel - inputs from various users deploying linux in
> their enterprises. This did tend to degenerate quickly to a
> list of requirements.
>
> The one everyone seems to want is chipsets, so is this the one we want
> to shoot for this year?
chipsets is probably more interesting than cpus, yes. Most useful would
be other open source projects and their requirements/wishes from the kernel,
but we're already discussing that elsewhere in this maze of threads..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists