lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200701310940.26040.oliver@neukum.name>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:40:14 +0100 (MET)
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.name>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: question on resume()

Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2007 09:33 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Tuesday, 30 January 2007 23:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Generally, you are safe if your driver only calls wake_up() from a process
> > context, but not from .resume() or .suspend() routines (or from an
> > unfreezeable kernel thread).
> 
> Ah, sorry, I've just realized I was wrong.  Processes in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> cannot be frozen!  So, the above only applies to wake_up_interruptible().

So the kernel will wait for tasks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE to finish IO
before it calls suspend()? I am confused.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ