[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070131101710.GB22377@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:17:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/23] clocksource: add block notifier
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> Adds a call back interface for register/rating change events. This is
> also used later in this series to signal other interesting events.
This patch adds:
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_REGISTER 1
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_RATING 2
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_FREQ 4
and a later patch adds:
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_UNSTABLE 8
while i tentatively agree with the introduction of clocksource driver
notifications in general (given any actual real users of that
infrastructure), i can see three problems with your notifier changes:
firstly, with the full changes applied, CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_RATING is
totally unused (and not even driven by the core clocksource code).
secondly, CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_REGISTER is only used by the core
clocksource code and no register-notifier interface is exposed: this
makes the whole thing an expensive NOP.
thirdly, CLOCKSOURCE_NOTIFY_FREQ is totally unused as well.
(there are tons of examples in the kernel of how to do driver
notification APIs properly.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists