[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C0C542.2090609@emc.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:35:14 -0500
From: Ric Wheeler <ric@....com>
To: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, dougg@...que.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR
Alan wrote:
>> When libata reports a MEDIUM_ERROR to us, we *know* it's non-recoverable,
>> as the drive itself has already done internal retries (libata uses the
>> "with retry" ATA opcodes for this).
>
> This depends on the firmware. Some of the "raid firmware" drives don't
> appear to do retries in firmware.
I think that even for these devices, the actual drives behind the controller
will do retries. In any case, it would be reasonable to be able to set this
retry/no-retry via /sys to handle exceptional cases...
>
>> But meanwhile, we still have the original issue too, where a single stray
>> bad sector can blow a system out of the water, because the mid-layer
>> currently aborts everything after it from a large merged request.
>>
>> Thus the original patch from this thread. :)
>
> Agreed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists