[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170261775.9781.100.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:42:55 -0800
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 12:50 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> > -module_init(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
> > +/*
> > + * This clocksource is removed from the clocksource_initcall
> > + * macro since it's mandatory for it to be in fs_initcall as the
> > + * highest initcall level, or else it doesn't work properly with
> > + * it's PCI fix ups.
> > + */
> > +fs_initcall(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
>
> ugh - this bit looks quite interesting.
>
> what's the purpose of this patch? Switching to high-res timers should be
> done late in the bootup - in case there's a problem it's more
> debuggable, etc.
The timekeeping code, and hrt/dynamic tick both wait till after boot up
to switch to high res mode ..
The specific code block you commented on above was added cause acpi_pm
has special pci fixups that don't function properly earlier in boot up.
So it can't be arbitrarily raised to order in the initcall sequence ..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists