[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170264177.29240.184.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:22:56 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] clocksource tsc: add verify routine
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:02 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > well, this implementation is buggy in at least two ways:
> >
> > firstly, it allows a circular verification dependency in highres+dyntick
> > mode between the jiffies and tsc clocksources.
>
> In the current implementation, it's only happens if the only clocks that
> exist are "tsc" and "jiffies" which makes verification impossible
> anyway .. It's unlikely, but it is possible , the fix is not that
> complex.
Wrong. You actually can verify against jiffies. Johns orginal code did
this and mine does too. Actually this _IS_ necessary otherwise you can
not detect that the BIOS changed the cpu freqeuncy behind the kernels
back.
The circular problem is only relevant when you switch to highres/nohz.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists