| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1170275784.5204.10.camel@dyn9047021078.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:36:24 -0800
From: Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>
To: cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] CELL SPU task notification
This is the updates to the patch previously posted by Maynard Johnson as
"PATCH 3/4 Add support to OProfile for profiling CELL". All concerns
have been addressed. The only open issue is the movement of the
notify_active flag to sched_flag in a future patch by Christoph
Hellwig's for SPU scheduling.
Subject: Enable SPU switch notification to detect currently active SPU
tasks.
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@...ibm.com>, Carl Love
<carll@...ibm.com>
This patch adds to the capability of spu_switch_event_register so that
the
caller is also notified of currently active SPU tasks. It also exports
spu_switch_event_register and spu_switch_event_unregister.
Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2007-01-18 16:43:14.324526032 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2007-01-30 09:35:03.237837184 -0600
@@ -78,21 +78,46 @@
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(spu_switch_notifier);
-static void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx)
+void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx)
{
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&spu_switch_notifier,
ctx ? ctx->object_id : 0, spu);
}
+static void notify_spus_active(void)
+{
+ int node;
+ /* Wake up the active spu_contexts. When the awakened processes
+ * sees their notify_active flag is set, they will call
+ * spu_switch_notify();
+ */
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
+ struct spu *spu;
+ mutex_lock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
+ list_for_each_entry(spu, &spu_prio->active_list[node], list) {
+ struct spu_context *ctx = spu->ctx;
+ spu->notify_active = 1;
+ wake_up_all(&ctx->stop_wq);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
+ }
+}
+
int spu_switch_event_register(struct notifier_block * n)
{
- return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
+ int ret;
+ ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
+ if (!ret)
+ notify_spus_active();
+ return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spu_switch_event_register);
int spu_switch_event_unregister(struct notifier_block * n)
{
return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spu_switch_event_unregister);
static inline void bind_context(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context
*ctx)
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
2007-01-18 16:43:14.340523600 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
2007-01-26 16:26:49.733703448 -0600
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@
int spu_activate(struct spu_context *ctx, u64 flags);
void spu_deactivate(struct spu_context *ctx);
void spu_yield(struct spu_context *ctx);
+void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx);
int __init spu_sched_init(void);
void __exit spu_sched_exit(void);
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c
2007-01-18 16:43:14.340523600 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c 2007-01-26
16:24:38.979744856 -0600
@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@
u64 pte_fault;
*stat = ctx->ops->status_read(ctx);
- if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
- return 1;
+
spu = ctx->spu;
+ if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE || spu->notify_active)
+ return 1;
pte_fault = spu->dsisr &
(MFC_DSISR_PTE_NOT_FOUND | MFC_DSISR_ACCESS_DENIED);
return (!(*stat & 0x1) || pte_fault || spu->class_0_pending) ? 1 : 0;
@@ -305,6 +306,7 @@
u32 *npc, u32 *event)
{
int ret;
+ struct spu * spu;
u32 status;
if (down_interruptible(&ctx->run_sema))
@@ -318,8 +320,16 @@
do {
ret = spufs_wait(ctx->stop_wq, spu_stopped(ctx, &status));
+ spu = ctx->spu;
if (unlikely(ret))
break;
+ if (unlikely(spu->notify_active)) {
+ spu->notify_active = 0;
+ if (!(status & SPU_STATUS_STOPPED_BY_STOP)) {
+ spu_switch_notify(spu, ctx);
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
if ((status & SPU_STATUS_STOPPED_BY_STOP) &&
(status >> SPU_STOP_STATUS_SHIFT == 0x2104)) {
ret = spu_process_callback(ctx);
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h 2007-01-18
16:43:19.932605072 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h 2007-01-24
12:17:30.209676992 -0600
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@
void* pdata; /* platform private data */
struct sys_device sysdev;
+ int notify_active;
};
struct spu *spu_alloc(void);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists