[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D9B3FCED-B132-4833-9CBF-39B06E551132@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:41:11 -0800
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
> Take FPU state: memory copies and RAID xor functions use MMX/SSE and
> require that the full task state be saved and restored.
Sure, that much is obvious. I was hoping to see what FPU state
juggling actually requires. I'm operating under the assumption that
it won't be *terrible*.
> Task priority is another. POSIX AIO lets you specify request
> priority, and
> it really is needed for realtime workloads where things like keepalive
> must be processed at a higher priority.
Yeah. A first-pass approximation might be to have threads with asys
system calls grouped by priority. Leaving all that priority handling
to the *task* scheduler, instead of the dirt-stupid fibril
"scheduler", would be great. If we can get away with it. I don't
have a good feeling for what portion of the world actually cares
about this, or to what degree.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists