[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070131153914.eb693314.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Simon Arlott <e5d74fcd64729b17de1hc0yh0003aeoo@...nder.lp0.eu>
Cc: Simon Arlott <simon@...ott.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cxacru: Store all device status information and
report it when atm_proc_read is called.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:30:29 +0000
Simon Arlott <simon@...ott.org> wrote:
> +static int cxacru_proc_read(struct usbatm_data *usbatm_instance,
> + struct atm_dev *atm_dev, loff_t * pos, char *page)
> +{
> + struct cxacru_data *instance = usbatm_instance->driver_data;
> + u32 *cxinf = instance->cxinf_status;
> + int left = *pos;
> +
> + if (!left--)
> + return sprintf(page, "# %s\n", usbatm_instance->description);
> +
> + if (!left--) {
> + if (cxinf[CXINF_LINE_STATUS] == 5) {
> + return sprintf(page, "# UP %u/%u\n",
> + cxinf[CXINF_DOWNSTREAM_RATE],
> + cxinf[CXINF_UPSTREAM_RATE]);
> + } else {
> + return sprintf(page, "# DOWN\n");
> + }
> + }
hm, how well-tested was this proc interface? The pread() and lseek()
behaviour might be strange.
I guess as long as it doesn't oops, hang or anything like that then it'll
be OK. Anyone who does anything apart from a single big-fat-read from a
procfile has a good chance of getting into trouble :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists